Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel

Implications for workplace health and safety compliance

Emily Sellens, Jacqueline M. Norris, Navneet K. Dhand, Jane Heller, Lynne Hayes, Heather F. Gidding, Harold Willaby, Nicholas Wood, Katrina L. Bosward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Q fever vaccine uptake among veterinary nurses in Australia is low, suggesting veterinarians are not recommending the vaccination to veterinary personnel. This study aimed to determine the willingness of veterinarians to recommend Q fever vaccination to veterinary personnel and to identify factors influencing Q fever vaccine uptake by veterinary nurses in Australia. An online cross sectional survey targeted veterinarians and veterinary nurses in Australia in 2014. Responses were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with a willingness to recommend the vaccination, expressed by 35% (95% CI 31–38%) of veterinarians (n = 828), were (1) being very concerned for colleagues regarding Coxiella burnetii (OR 4.73), (2) disagreeing the vaccine is harmful (OR 3.80), (3) high Q fever knowledge (OR 2.27), (4) working within small animal practice (OR 1.67), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.55), and (6) age, with veterinarians under 39 years most likely to recommend vaccination. Of the veterinary nursing cohort who reported a known Q fever vaccination status (n = 688), 29% (95% CI 26–33%) had sought vaccination. This was significantly (p<0.05) associated with (1) agreeing the vaccine is important (OR 8.34), (2) moderate/high Q fever knowledge (OR 5.51), (3) working in Queensland (OR 4.00), (4) working within livestock/mixed animal practice (OR 3.24), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.86), (6) strong reliance on work culture for biosecurity information (OR 2.5), (7) perceiving personal exposure to Coxiella burnetii to be at least low/moderate (OR 2.14), and (8) both agreeing the vaccine is safe and working within a corporate practice structure (OR 4.28). The study identified the need for veterinarians to take greater responsibility for workplace health and safety promotion, and calls for better education of veterinary personnel to raise awareness of the potential for occupational.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0198421
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Q fever
Q Fever
Veterinarians
working conditions
Workplace
compliance
human resources
Compliance
veterinarians
Vaccination
Vaccines
vaccination
Health
Personnel
vaccines
Animal Technicians
Safety
nurses
Coxiella burnetii
Professional Corporations

Cite this

Sellens, Emily ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Dhand, Navneet K. ; Heller, Jane ; Hayes, Lynne ; Gidding, Heather F. ; Willaby, Harold ; Wood, Nicholas ; Bosward, Katrina L. / Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel : Implications for workplace health and safety compliance. In: PLoS One. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 1-15.
@article{8b8a15f2d4774fdea034806a44e7afcf,
title = "Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel: Implications for workplace health and safety compliance",
abstract = "Q fever vaccine uptake among veterinary nurses in Australia is low, suggesting veterinarians are not recommending the vaccination to veterinary personnel. This study aimed to determine the willingness of veterinarians to recommend Q fever vaccination to veterinary personnel and to identify factors influencing Q fever vaccine uptake by veterinary nurses in Australia. An online cross sectional survey targeted veterinarians and veterinary nurses in Australia in 2014. Responses were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with a willingness to recommend the vaccination, expressed by 35{\%} (95{\%} CI 31–38{\%}) of veterinarians (n = 828), were (1) being very concerned for colleagues regarding Coxiella burnetii (OR 4.73), (2) disagreeing the vaccine is harmful (OR 3.80), (3) high Q fever knowledge (OR 2.27), (4) working within small animal practice (OR 1.67), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.55), and (6) age, with veterinarians under 39 years most likely to recommend vaccination. Of the veterinary nursing cohort who reported a known Q fever vaccination status (n = 688), 29{\%} (95{\%} CI 26–33{\%}) had sought vaccination. This was significantly (p<0.05) associated with (1) agreeing the vaccine is important (OR 8.34), (2) moderate/high Q fever knowledge (OR 5.51), (3) working in Queensland (OR 4.00), (4) working within livestock/mixed animal practice (OR 3.24), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.86), (6) strong reliance on work culture for biosecurity information (OR 2.5), (7) perceiving personal exposure to Coxiella burnetii to be at least low/moderate (OR 2.14), and (8) both agreeing the vaccine is safe and working within a corporate practice structure (OR 4.28). The study identified the need for veterinarians to take greater responsibility for workplace health and safety promotion, and calls for better education of veterinary personnel to raise awareness of the potential for occupational.",
author = "Emily Sellens and Norris, {Jacqueline M.} and Dhand, {Navneet K.} and Jane Heller and Lynne Hayes and Gidding, {Heather F.} and Harold Willaby and Nicholas Wood and Bosward, {Katrina L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0198421",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
number = "6",

}

Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel : Implications for workplace health and safety compliance. / Sellens, Emily; Norris, Jacqueline M.; Dhand, Navneet K.; Heller, Jane; Hayes, Lynne; Gidding, Heather F.; Willaby, Harold; Wood, Nicholas; Bosward, Katrina L.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 6, e0198421, 01.06.2018, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel

T2 - Implications for workplace health and safety compliance

AU - Sellens, Emily

AU - Norris, Jacqueline M.

AU - Dhand, Navneet K.

AU - Heller, Jane

AU - Hayes, Lynne

AU - Gidding, Heather F.

AU - Willaby, Harold

AU - Wood, Nicholas

AU - Bosward, Katrina L.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Q fever vaccine uptake among veterinary nurses in Australia is low, suggesting veterinarians are not recommending the vaccination to veterinary personnel. This study aimed to determine the willingness of veterinarians to recommend Q fever vaccination to veterinary personnel and to identify factors influencing Q fever vaccine uptake by veterinary nurses in Australia. An online cross sectional survey targeted veterinarians and veterinary nurses in Australia in 2014. Responses were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with a willingness to recommend the vaccination, expressed by 35% (95% CI 31–38%) of veterinarians (n = 828), were (1) being very concerned for colleagues regarding Coxiella burnetii (OR 4.73), (2) disagreeing the vaccine is harmful (OR 3.80), (3) high Q fever knowledge (OR 2.27), (4) working within small animal practice (OR 1.67), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.55), and (6) age, with veterinarians under 39 years most likely to recommend vaccination. Of the veterinary nursing cohort who reported a known Q fever vaccination status (n = 688), 29% (95% CI 26–33%) had sought vaccination. This was significantly (p<0.05) associated with (1) agreeing the vaccine is important (OR 8.34), (2) moderate/high Q fever knowledge (OR 5.51), (3) working in Queensland (OR 4.00), (4) working within livestock/mixed animal practice (OR 3.24), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.86), (6) strong reliance on work culture for biosecurity information (OR 2.5), (7) perceiving personal exposure to Coxiella burnetii to be at least low/moderate (OR 2.14), and (8) both agreeing the vaccine is safe and working within a corporate practice structure (OR 4.28). The study identified the need for veterinarians to take greater responsibility for workplace health and safety promotion, and calls for better education of veterinary personnel to raise awareness of the potential for occupational.

AB - Q fever vaccine uptake among veterinary nurses in Australia is low, suggesting veterinarians are not recommending the vaccination to veterinary personnel. This study aimed to determine the willingness of veterinarians to recommend Q fever vaccination to veterinary personnel and to identify factors influencing Q fever vaccine uptake by veterinary nurses in Australia. An online cross sectional survey targeted veterinarians and veterinary nurses in Australia in 2014. Responses were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with a willingness to recommend the vaccination, expressed by 35% (95% CI 31–38%) of veterinarians (n = 828), were (1) being very concerned for colleagues regarding Coxiella burnetii (OR 4.73), (2) disagreeing the vaccine is harmful (OR 3.80), (3) high Q fever knowledge (OR 2.27), (4) working within small animal practice (OR 1.67), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.55), and (6) age, with veterinarians under 39 years most likely to recommend vaccination. Of the veterinary nursing cohort who reported a known Q fever vaccination status (n = 688), 29% (95% CI 26–33%) had sought vaccination. This was significantly (p<0.05) associated with (1) agreeing the vaccine is important (OR 8.34), (2) moderate/high Q fever knowledge (OR 5.51), (3) working in Queensland (OR 4.00), (4) working within livestock/mixed animal practice (OR 3.24), (5) disagreeing the vaccine is expensive (OR 1.86), (6) strong reliance on work culture for biosecurity information (OR 2.5), (7) perceiving personal exposure to Coxiella burnetii to be at least low/moderate (OR 2.14), and (8) both agreeing the vaccine is safe and working within a corporate practice structure (OR 4.28). The study identified the need for veterinarians to take greater responsibility for workplace health and safety promotion, and calls for better education of veterinary personnel to raise awareness of the potential for occupational.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048046434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048046434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0198421

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0198421

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e0198421

ER -