Workplace violence involving radiographers at a state radiology department in Windhoek Namibia

Charne Hattingh, Caroline Nabasenja, Edwin R Daniels, Luzanne Kalondo, Abel Karera, Mondjila Amkongo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

369 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The international prevalence of workplace violence (WPV) in the healthcare sector, and isolated cases involving radiographers in a state radiology department in Windhoek, Namibia instigated this research. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of WPV, identify its perpetrators, and determine the emotional state and coping mechanisms of radiographers after WPV incidents. A
standardised questionnaire that assessed WPV was distributed to the fifteen radiographers with experience of working night duty. Thirteen questionnaires were returned (response rate = 86.7%). All the respondents had experienced WPV that predominately occurred during night duty. All had experienced verbal abuse (100%) followed by verbal threats (84.6%), sexual harassment (84.6%), and physical assault (46.2%). Causes of WPV included intoxicated patients (100%), long waiting times (61.5%), overcrowding (30.8%), and failure to meet the expectations of patients and their family members (23.1%). WPV perpetrators were mostly patients followed by their family members. The majority of the respondents did not report their respective WPV incidents to the authorities. They were however anxious, disappointed, disgusted and sad after the incidents. They coped by ignoring the incidents or talking to a colleague or family member. The high prevalence of WPV, and its negative implications, requires employers
to devise measures to prevent its re-occurrence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalSouth African Radiographer
Volume57
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workplace violence involving radiographers at a state radiology department in Windhoek Namibia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this