World Poverty, Animal Minds and the Ethics of Veterinary Expenditure

John Hadley, Siobhan O'Sullivan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    17 Downloads (Pure)


    In this paper we make an argument for limiting veterinary expenditure on companion animals. The argument combines two principles: the obligation to give and the self-consciousness requirement. In line with the former, we ought to give money to organisations helping to alleviate preventable suffering and death in developing countries; the latter states that it is only intrinsically wrong to painlessly kill an individual that is self-conscious. Combined, the two principles inform an argument along the following lines: rather than spending inordinate amounts of money on veterinary care when a companion animal is sick or injured, it is better to give the money to an aid organisation and painlessly kill the animal.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)361-389
    Number of pages29
    JournalEnvironmental Values
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2009


    Dive into the research topics of 'World Poverty, Animal Minds and the Ethics of Veterinary Expenditure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this